Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Summer Reads 8: Deirdre and Don Juan

The Before:
All I cant think of is how the English pronounce "Juan"... J = H in Spanish, Lord Byron.

The Feels:
ummmm... no.

The Concerns:
This story is about a hypersexual "Latin" Lover. 

First of all, that's racist. People from Latin American have been hypersexualized for too long.

Second, hE'S FrOM SpAIn! And therefore NOT Latin.

The best part of this book is that it reminded me about the hypersexualization of people with darker skin, especially those from Latin America. I will be addressing this in my upcoming novel that I am writing. 

Plot: 0/10
Writing Style: 1/10
Meaningfullness: 0/10

Monday, June 29, 2020

Summer Reads 7: The Fortune Hunter by Jo Beverley

The Before:
I was a little excited about this one. The summary made me think of Sense and Sensibility.

The Feels:
I skimmed this one. It isn't bad, at least none of the plot points I picked  up on were. It's like off-brand Sense and Sensibility, but gives the heroine a more progressive sense of independence. I liked that she knew she was pretty and really didn't dwell on it. I feel like so many female leads are the "I'm not like other girls, I'm so ugly, but everyone thinks I'm pretty and I attract every man I meet." Amy is confidant in her looks without being obsessed too. She isn't vain, she just knows that beauty can bring unwanted attention.

The Concerns:
Nothing really.
 

Plot: 7/10
Writing Style: 7/10
Meaningfullness: 6/10

Summer Reads 6: Enchant by Demelza Carlton

*Trigger warning: This book involved a plot element around rape and sexual assault, although it does do this in a trauma informed way.*

The Before:
I've read this one before, but I was in desperate need of a palate cleanser after that last bit of trash. It was just as good as I remember! I wish Carlton was more widely read.

The Feels:
This is a great retelling of Beauty and the Beast. Carlton does great work making Belle an active character through her character Zuleika. She also struggles with PTSD. It was clear to me that Carlton has a solid understanding of sexual assault and the trauma that goes along with it. This is how a book should use rape as not just a throw away plot point, but as a trauma that can effect characters in different ways. 

There is some sexual content in this book. Nothing too graphic though. I would give it a PG-13 to mayyybe an R. There is nothing really described in the rape scene (thankfully!). That scene is mainly about what Zuleika thinks and feels.

The Beast, Vardan, is an emotionally intuitive, which is great to see in a masculine lead. He cares deeply about those around him and is just lonely. He also already hated his brother, and how his brother treated Zuleika just adds to this. I don't like it when sexual assault is a plot point to make two men hate each other. Sadly, that doesn't happen in real life.

The Concerns:
It's implied that Zuleika's PTSD is just cured at the end of the book... I don't like that. I think a little more thought should have been put into that. 


Plot: 10/10 
Writing Style: 9/10
Meaningfullness: 10/10

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

The Waking Land by Callie Bates

The Before:
OOO pretty cover. Looks a little like Alice in Wonderland. I'm borrowing this one from the library as an audiobook. 

The Feels:
The world building in this novel is fantastic! Highly diverse, racially, culturally, and linguistically. Love that! I really wanted to spend more time in this world. The narrator was also great; she really read into the world well.

A bonus is that this fantasy world is LGBT+ friendly. El mentions that men could be attracted to the male lead and it is even implied that he might be sleeping with a prince.

The Concerns:
The world building was a little too confusing. I thought El's father for the longest time was the "pretender" king. But then he wasn't? I guess he's just a lesser king?

El... is stupid. She focuses on the small picture as opposed to the big picture. She complains that her father is a pretend king, because he's lazy and lives off other people. What about the king that she lived with? She finds out pretty early on that he was crazy corrupt and kept stealing from the poor. All she thinks is, "Well that sucks... I'm going to go be a healer." She lacks self-awareness of her privileged and I honestly can't tell if the reader is supposed to pick up on this or not. Bates really hits you over the head with the fact that  El is sort of a dingus. She complains about how her family "abandoned her"... EL.... YOU ARE BEING HELD HOSTAGE. That's sort of the point... They CANT get you back. She also wonders if she still has her powers as a child. This wouldn't be stupid, if she hadn't just used her powers.

The term "regicide". That's ducking stupid. It's called assassination.

I really think this book could have used a more critical eye in the editing process. There were just so many bad things that were distracting to the reader. This could have been such a great book! DNF😭

Plot: 9/10
Writing Style: 2/10
Meaningfullness: 9/10

Summer Reads 5: A Talent for Trouble by Anne Barbour

The Before:
Back cover uses the word "Ton" instead of London... This should have been my first warning.

The Feels:
None.

The Concerns:
Clearly Barbour needs to do some more research on the Regency Era. Yes, London is referred to as Town, but it's pretty rare to see it as ton. That's just stupid and annoying.

The male lead, whose name I can't remember and won't be bothered to look it up, chastises the female lead, Matilda or whatever, about her painting. When he finds out that she's good at painting, I kid you not, he says, "but you're a woman?" Women in the Regency Era were expected to know how to paint, especially in the upper class. That's a whole subplot in Austen's Emma. It was one of the few things women were allowed to do; that and draw. It would be like him saying, "WOW! You know how to read? But you're a woman."

DNF- Had to rage quit. 


Plot: 1/10 (Purely because it has one.)
Writing Style: 0/10
Meaningfullness: 0/10

Summer Reads 4: A Dedicated Scoundrel by Anne Barbour

The Before:
Yet another book from my Esty box. I loved the line on the back cover, "He called himself John Smith, but to Catherine his name was temptation." 

I couldn't not read this one.

The Feels:
It was a pretty good romance. Catherine was a good character. She felt a little more well rounded as opposed to some of the previous female main characters. She was an active character and (understandably) didn't exactly trust Justin to begin with.

The Concerns:
Justin is all of the problems with this book rolled into one. I mean, first of all, "Justin" is a 80's/90's d-bag name, not the name of a leading man in a Regency Romance. Surprisingly, I did not take issue with his amnesia. I didn't like that we as the reader knows who he is and are inside his head. That gets things a bit confusing. It would have been a lot better it Barbour just kept the reader with Catherine.

Justin was also accused of rape by a woman in his past...
Yeah, I'm not on board with that. And it's a very quickly dismissed line. This book was published in '97 and I really thought we would have more sensitivity to that sort of thing. And it never says that it wasn't rape... It just says that his seduction of her was consensual from his perspective. Gross.


Plot: 5/10
Writing Style: 6/10
Meaningfullness: 1/10

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Romance Summer Reads 3: The Indifferent Earl by Blair Bancroft

The Before:
The Indifferent Earl by Blair Bancroft was one of the books in my Etsy order. The plot of a school headmistress going to live in an English cottage she inherits was what initially intrigued me. 

The Feels:
Yet another dud. *sigh*

The Concerns:
I really wanted to get into this one. Abigail is basically my life goals; An American school teacher that inherits an English mansion and falls in love with an earl. Too bad she sucks. All she does is complain about how the United States is the best and England needs to get off its high horse. To be fair, it was published in 2003, meaning it was being written right after 9/11... meaning the American author had a lot of feels about America. It did not age well and Abigail is insufferable. The Earl of Langley, Jared, isn't the greatest either. Also what kind of fuckboi name is Jared.


Plot: 2/10
Writing Style: 2/10
Meaningfullness: 1/10

Summer Reads 1 & 2: Diane Gaston's The Governess Swap Series

The Before:
I had purchased A Lady Becomes a Governess a while back and recently purchased the sequel, Shipwrecked with the Captain. I love your standard Regency Romance, so we'll see how this goes.

The Feels:
A Lady Becomes a Governess: It's amazing! I love this book. Just your standard Regency Romance like I thought. Really not much more than that though. If you want a nice Regency Romance, here's a good pick. The characters are fine and the plot has a few small twists, nothing too thrilling though.
Shipwrecked with the Captain: Dull... DNF. I think it was the main character mixed with the amnesia plot. Claire is very much a Beth March... *screams internally*... It's pretty much just assumed that she died in the first book. Gaston could really have just left it at that.

The Concerns:
I really don't have any concerns about this series. The first book was a great read, while the sequel left much to be desired as far as plot and character development goes. I didn't hate it and there weren't any of the usual concerns, like abuse or prejudice. It was just boring. I'm not a fan of amnesia plot lines. The bonus of this series is that it doesn't have to be... You can just read the first book. 😅

A Lady Becomes a Governess
Plot: 8/10
Writing Style: 7/10
Meaningfullness: 5/10

Shipwrecked with the Captain
Plot: 2/10
Writing Style: 4/10
Meaningfullness: 2/10

Monday, June 22, 2020

A Defense of Amy March

It has recently been brought to my attention that Amy March is the least liked of the four March sisters in Louisa May Alcott's Little Women. I was honestly shocked by this! Sure, Amy is a bit of a snotty brat in Volume 1, but she's a child who has been growing up through one of the most difficult times in American History. I think her brattiness about limes can be forgiven. 

But you know who can't be forgiven? Do you know who the true villain of Little Women is? 

It's Beth and here's why I hate her.

Beth is annoying. She is arguably the most annoying character in the book. She was the "goodest" of the sisters. This not because of anything she actively does for other people, but because she doesn't do anything bad, like the other characters. Beth does nothing. She doesn't effect the plot. She doesn't go anywhere. She doesn't come up with any good ideas. She is only good, because everyone else around her does things, both good and back. 

When one compares Beth to other "goodest" characters, she also comes out pretty flat. Jane Bennet is supposed to be the core of her sisters. Jane stops the infighting between her sisters, she advises Elizabeth, she empathy for her mother (which few other characters show). She is the "goodest" Bennet sister and gets her happy ending. Beth, on the other hand, helps her sister when she's sick and has to die for it. Beth didn't work to earn anything in the novel. Another type of "goodest" character is the abuse victim. Beth not a Cinderella or a Jane Eyre, where she's actually abused by her family and has to over come her situation. She's just sort of there.

It's pretty common for people to see Beth as the grounded, optimistic sister. She's not optimistic. She just wishes for things to be different or like how they were. because if she was, she would actually do something to help her family get out of their situation. The other three sisters do what they can while Beth just gazes wistfully out the window. I see her has more of a complainer than as an optimist. Amy March is greedy and a little lazy, but she marries well in order to provide for herself and her family. Meg also marries to help her family. Jo... well she shouldn't  have gotten married, but she did manage to follow her dreams. 

So... I hate Beth. And honestly, I think Alcott relished killing her off, just so she didn't have to write her character anymore.

Further Reading:

Sunday, June 14, 2020

Westering Women by Sandra Dallas

*A Trigger Warning: characters in this novel face traumas such as death, sexual assault, and other violence against women and children that will be referenced in this post.*

The Before:
I found Westering Women when scrolling through the audiobooks provided by my local library. I have been interested in the lives women throughout history. Although it is not a traditional romance novel, it is a story of love between women and the bonds of sisterhood. Recently, I have seen stories of friendship love become more common in literature. This can be seen in films such as "Bridesmaids" or "The Half of It". Although I haven't read it myself, from what I understand Eleanor and Park by Rainbow Rowell is a novel with similar themes. 

The Feels:
Maggie is a great main character. She's a little bit naive and meek. I get the meekness, because she had been in an abusive relationship with her husband for years. I don't understand how she can be so naive though, especially since her husband was so monstrous to her.

Any character named Lavinia is always going to be terrible (Thank you "Downton Abbey"). This novel was actually able to help me build some empathy for a Lavinia.

When looking at reviews on Goodreads, I noticed a lot of people being upset with the "men bashing" in this book. I think what people don't understand that this novel portrays a fairly accurate depiction of how men were allowed to act historically. We really only hear about the abusive men, because we are following a group of women who were abused. It would be totally different if the book was about a group of high society women. Maybe then we would only one or two women who face violence from their husbands. The women we follow have faced trauma throughout their lives, which implies that everyone they know has faced some sort of trauma. Being surrounded by trauma is a trait most common in the people in our society that are the most down trodden. A way for men to deal wth their trauma (in a subconscious way) was/is for them to act out in violence. At the time this story takes place, the law and society even supports them being allow to act violently toward their wives. This was a harsh reality of the time and I really don't see this as the author bashing men in the novel. Yes, there are some men in the novel that do terrible things, but, to me, it does not come across as them doing these terrible things for no reason. Even if someone today were to argue with one of these men doing bad in the novel, he would argue back that his wife is his property and he could do what he wished with her and the law would openly be on his side. This is actually what started First Wave Feminism, women fighting back and supporting each other by pointing out that the constitution stated all people were free (...except for slaves... and American Indians... and other non-white people... and the Irish... and the Italians... oh and don't forget about children... and those in prison...) It's horrible, but this is the way things were... (are?)

The ending of the book makes some of the more dull parts worth it. Please know that there is a lot of suffering in this book, but it has a joyous ending.

The Concerns:
There is a lot in this book about sexual assault. I'm glad that Dallas addressed the suffering that many women have historically gone through. What bothered me was how the women reacted to their assaults. I understand that different people will react to trauma in different ways and I respect that. What I take issue with is that the women in this novel will react to other traumas they face, but they don't react to the sexual assaults that happen to them. I know that writing a character that has gone through sexual trauma can be difficult and I can tell Dallas clearly tried. I just wish she had developed the characters more, because otherwise, it makes it feel like sexual assault is being used as a plot point. One of the sexual assaults I feel should have been left out deals with a small child and her father. That felt a little unnecessarily violent and like a quickly forgotten plot point by the main characters. Instead she could have had the father hit or almost hit the child, because it would have left the mother with a similar reaction. Don't get me wrong, hitting a child is a terrible thing, but sexually assaulting a child is far worse and it was implied that it had happened before. In my opinion, that's just too much.

I'm not a fan of how race in portrayed in this book. Being a racist is common amongst the villains in the novel. For me, it trivializes racism. In the book you either think whites are better than everyone or not, which is just not the case in real life. The way the Native Americans are portrayed in the novel is actually fairly racist; the book gives off the a "noble savage" vibe. I kept waiting for the group to come across a Native American that they would help or would help them or join the group, but instead they were treated as either violent or drunks or abusive to "their women". We don't hear from any characters of color, we just hear what white characters have to say about them. Evelyn, the only black character, is highly educated and has been cared for as a loved servant by the wealthiest woman in the group. Maggie never really interacts with her and we never seen anything from her perspective.

Then I looked at her Goodreads profile and it stated that she writes about themes such as "human dignity". Not when it comes to people of color. Not when it comes to this particular book. I'm going to have to take off a lot of points for this. I am completely disappointed in Dallas.


Plot: 8/10
Writing Style: 7/10
Meaningfullness: /210

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Summer Romance Goals

So a few weeks ago, I made a dumb purchase. I saw a listing of 64 paperback romance novels on Etsy and I... couldn't not buy it. Because of this, I have decided to make one of my summer goals to read as many romance novels as possible. Although what I have are mostly heteronormative, I do plan on seeking out even more novels with LGBTQIAA themes. 

There is a secondary reason for me concentrating on romance novels right now. I am planning on applying to a few different MFA programs this summer. I have an idea for a gothic-romance heavily rooted in race and feminism that I really want to write. I think it would be a perfect first novel for me and I have found a lot of programs I could receive proper support in writing it.

As a I read through these novels, I also want to find new ways for me to look at the romance genre, aka the only genre dominated by female authors. I was really inspired to do all of this by a fantastic film analyst, Lindsay Ellis. Her video on Romance Novels opened my eyes to so many nuanced topics in romance.

Check out Lindsay's video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0l5yEY_IlY

Linda Castillo: Kate Burkholder Series (10.5)

Linda Castillo is one of my favorite murder mystery novelists. Right now, I am reading a few of her short stories that fit in between the full novels in the Kate Burkholder Series. I will be reading them a bit out of order, but I will keep all updates on this specific post, in an attempt to keep things at least a little bit organized. 

First Read: In Plain Sight (book 10.5)
The Summary:
A young Amish man hurt in a hit and run after a going to a dance with his English girlfriend. It's up to Kate to find the attacker before the attacker strikes again.

The Feels:
John and Kate are my favorite mystery couple. They have both faced trauma in the past and are actively working towards bettering themselves, not to mention the strong chemistry they have. The events of In Plain Sight are no exception to this. John takes a bit of a passive role, but he's always right there in order to support our favorite chief of police.

I love how Mona is becoming more of a lead character and I hope Castillo plays up more on Kate as a mentor to her. I like this powerful women mentor-mentee situation was played up a little in this story, being that Mona was one of the few characters Kate interacts with.

I liked the inclusion of the more modern slang in this story. Nice to see Castillo keeping up with the times.

The Concerns:
I think the story should have been a little bit longer in order to develop a few of the characters more. Ashley in particular feels a little too flat. 

I like that Mona was in this one. Would like to see more from Glock, the African American popo in this series. I know he is happily married (with kids, I think), but I can't help but ship him and Mona, even though Castillo implied in a different novel that she was with P.J.


Plot: 9/10
Writing Style: 10/10
Meaningfullness: 7/10